|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
290
   |
Posted - 2013.10.12 05:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
As I see it, the entire relationship between the BC and CS types is messed up.
For instance, the Prophecy hull is all curves and yet it has slots for missile launchers which, being angular and non-retracting, look horribly out of place on it. Same situation on the Damnation. On the other hand, turrets would look fine lined up on the Harbinger's weapon sponsons.
Swapping the high slot layouts of the two hulls would correct this situation and make the Prophecy hull the appropriate choice for the Absolution and the Harbinger hull right for the Damnation.
No doubt this would also mean tinkering with cpu and powergrid stats, which I'm sure would be way beyond the scope of what is intended.
In other words, this is a classic "Don't start from here" situation. |
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
290
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kane Fenris wrote:Tinukeda'ya Naskingar wrote:OTMOROSOK wrote:Dear CCP Fozzie, You've writen:
> The plan is:
> Absolution becomes a Carthum Harbinger
> Eos becomes a CreoDron Myrmidon
> Nighthawk becomes a Kaalakiota Drake
> Sleipnir becomes a Boundless Creations Hurricane
Have You ever been playing EVE? Have You taken the part in medium or large gangs ever? Let's imagine that You are saying in team speaker: "Primary Boundless Creations Hurricane! Shoot Boundless Creations Hurricane!" Do You really think that this is possible in real fight?
..
..
..
The player. As mentioned a lot of times already, they are not changing the names. They only said which skin/model that ship will become... Names are safe... you did not understand him  one part of the reasoning for the change was that now models and progression should be optically possible. he was sarcastic, by saying people would actually identify ships like that when the use overview and names ..... so basically the main "gameplay" reasoning for this change is bull****
No, I think Tinukeda'ya got it right.
|
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
294
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 09:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:As I see it, the entire relationship between the BC and CS types is messed up.
For instance, the Prophecy hull is all curves and yet it has slots for missile launchers which, being angular and non-retracting, look horribly out of place on it. Same situation on the Damnation. On the other hand, launchers would look fine lined up on the Harbinger's weapon sponsons.
Swapping the high slot layouts of the two hulls would correct this situation and make the Prophecy hull the appropriate choice for the Absolution and the Harbinger hull right for the Damnation.
No doubt this would also mean tinkering with cpu and powergrid stats, which I'm sure would be way beyond the scope of what is intended.
In other words, this is a classic "Don't start from here" situation.
On second thoughts, forget the high slots and just swap the Prophecy and Harbinger hulls, then match the Damnation with the new Prophecy. |
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
298
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 20:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Joanna RB wrote:Westerly Winds wrote:Literally un-subbing this account after this post. Why is the drake model EVEN IN THE GAME? I swear this art department... I bet if you showed a picture or a 3D model of a drake to 100 non-eve players noone would guess it was supposed to be a spaceship...
I'd take that bet. |
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
299
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 00:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
El Jin'meiko wrote:I rather like the way you say you don't have time to implement the changes . . . ?
Where did he say that? |
|
|
| |
|